Free Shooting Introduction

In the effort to promote responsible gun ownership and rights awareness, I make the following open offer to any resident or visitor in the Metro DC area:

If you have never shot a gun and would like to try, I am willing to take you shooting free of charge. I will provide the firearms, ammunition, eye/ear protection and I will cover your range fees. I guarantee if you are on the fence about gun ownership and usage, you will not be at the end of the session. You will have fun and learn a little in the process.

I do my introductions in Northern Virginia. Evenings or on the weekends at your convenience with minimal prior arrangements. Contact me for details and to schedule your free introduction!

If you are in the Chesapeake/Hampton Roads area, Brian, an NRA instructor in Virginia Beach, is willing to do the same if you're in the area on a Sunday afternoon or Monday evening. Drop him a note to make the arrangements.

5 people have learned to shoot! Would you like to be next?

Monday, April 27, 2009

Loopholes and Insanity

Let us start with the insanity.

Over the weekend, the Today Show once again repeated the claim that the Arctic would be ice-free in the summer by 2013. I guess the reporting on the boogeyman of "global warming", er "climate change", er "The Earth is going to kill us all!" has slackened off a bit.

That's a way to get me to throw dog toys at the TV on a Saturday morning. The funny thing is, that prediction makes it sound more dire than it actually is. They make it sound like all of the Arctic ice is going to disappear. In reality, the prediction is the Arctic ice will retreat to make the bulk of the Arctic Ocean passable where it previously has not been. This predication has been around since 2007.

Big deal. Shorter shipping routes, Arctic tourist cruises and the like. What's wrong with that?

It was after that announcement that the Today show revealed the agenda for bringing it up because a new "scare and guilt them" program on "global warming", er "climate change", er "The Earth is going to kill us all!" about how if the ice melts we'd all be under 20+ feet of water at the coasts. Of course, leave it to the MSM to conflate two issues. First they talked about the Arctic and then ever so slyly shifted to the Greenland glaciers. Since the average person isn't very knowledgeable about science and, more importantly, geography they may not realize they weren't the same thing. But it creates in the minds of the gullible the notion that if the Arctic melts, we're all going to drown.

Sigh. As much as I despise stupid people, purveyors of lies and deliberate deception like this are far worse. I'd go as far as to call it "evil".

The following day there were into the breathless panic of swine flu. It seems my feelings on that matter are echoed here at work in the form of we are getting seriously annoyed at the panic mongering the MSM is engaging in on this issue of the day. 80 or so deaths in Mexico does not constitute a "pandemic". 20 or so cases here in the US without a single fatality does not allow you to hang that mantra on this.

For a real definition of "pandemic", see Spanish Flu circa 1918 and then get back to me. For the uninitiated, "pan" in "pandemic" means "everywhere". Global. Spot cases here and there and isolated to a few countries even across the ocean is not a pandemic.

So more dog toys got tossed at the TV.

As a result, I needed to work on my anger management in a peaceful fashion so I went to the gun show.

This was more insanity. I can honestly say this trip was mainly entertainment. Since like a lot of shooters I'm sitting on my stockpile, I was observing the behavior of others. I have never seen ammo pallets getting the once over like this since the great Cabbage Patch Doll Christmas panic of 1982. $500 for 1000 rounds of .223 ball ammo? Even more for Lake City SS109. Sorry kids, it ain't worth $600+ per thousand. It was fun to watch others hug the cases to their chest like it was Corrine Marie in her new yellow jumper and low numbered adoption certificate, breathless with Visa in hand.

And yet, by Saturday afternoon the ammo dealers were selling the pallets themselves. Cheaper to sell them at $10 a pop than load them back onto the truck. Ammo tables were mostly stripped bare. By the way, if anyone knows where all the .45ACP has gone, please let me know. Lots of .40S&W and .380 to be found even if at outrageous prices but .45 appears to disappeared off the edge of the world. Same goes for 7.5mm French. I want to find the person who cleaned out my favorite dealer on that stuff. He had several cans of it one day, gone the next.

There's always July and I can wait.

Which brings us to the loophole part. Several interesting rifles presented themselves and next time, I will listen to my instincts and the urgings of my wife to give them money today and go back tomorrow to do the paperwork. A couple of nice Hakims and a very unusual Martini-Henry converted to .303.

Now usually a .303 Martini-Enfield (as such rifles are called) isn't anything to write home about. But this was either a re-arsenal or new build in 1916 which made it a 4473 transfer and the fact, unlike other Martini-Enfields, this one had an SMLE front end on it. My evening research couldn't find any reference to such a conversion which would make it quite a unique addition to the collection. Feed ramp and the gun overall was in great shape. Bluing was intact, probably 90%+. It got my focused attention at $350.

I said it would be there tomorrow if I wanted it. Leave it to me to have permission and then waffle out of guilt. Unfortunately, someone else got the same message and it and its Hakim companion were gone when I returned. A couple of nice Martini-Henrys and a Snider-Enfield tempted me but since there were no Enfield marks on the Snider's lock, I decided I didn't want to take a chance on an unknown rifle.

So I made up for it at the table next door. The only thing nicer than buying guns is buying guns without a background check. There you go anti-rights people! Gun show loophole! Gun show loophole!

I wasn't in the mood for the four hour delay again. As I've said in the past, the whole NICS check makes me feel like a criminal and I hate that feeling. So I'm giving preference to antiques. Guns made in or before 1898 are not considered firearms under Federal law and can be sold cash-and-carry anywhere in the country and even bought and sold mail order.

The dealer had a Steyr Gewehr Model 1888 Commission Rifle. A couple of dents in the barrel shroud but wood was good, bluing was good on the barrel and bore was strong. Made in 1891 and chambered in 8mm Mauser. Next to it was an Italian 1880 Vetterli converted to 6.5mm Carcano with original sling and bayonet. A little back and forth and five minutes later, I'm walking out of the gun show with a rifle under each arm.

Yes, I bought evil, scary 19th century "assault weapons" without a background check! At a gun show! In Virginia as a Maryland resident! Call 20/20! Seriously though, the Vetterli needs some work but the Gewehr 88 just needs a bit of cleaning. I may even actually shoot that one. Both are pretty and sometimes you just need to buy a gun because you like it. Personally, I see old guns as unwanted pets in a shelter: they need to be adopted into a loving home and showered with attention.

Some people may find this disturbing that someone can walk into a gun show and walk out with guns without a background check. You need to understand that at no time were any laws broken. If you are unable or unwilling to at least understand the law as it pertains to transactions involving antique firearms, let alone private transfer laws that apply to modern firearms, don't comment on how such a "loophole" needs to be closed let alone demand legislation by force to do so. You're arguing from a position of profound ignorance and it is frankly getting very tiring.

You also need to understand that on the long timeline of liberty, anonymous firearms ownership is a must. I don't care if you can't see past your prejudices and personal horror that the government may not know who has guns. That's the whole point! As long as there are firearms out there, antique or modern, that cannot be accounted for the possibility of us being pushed too far and fighting back as the Founders intended will always remain.

As a co-worker commented to me, "If someone can buy a gun like that and walk out, what's the point of the background check? Doesn't that go around its purpose?".

Yes, it does. While I am not wholly opposed to background checks and dislike how they are currently applied, he was spot on. Honestly, the point of background checks are mainly for people to feel good that something was done to potentially keep bad people from getting guns. Virtually none of the people who fail the background checks due to being prohibited from owning firearms are ever prosecuted. So have them if you want but don't believe for a second that it prevents gun crime. After all, the Virginia Tech shooter passed two background checks in acquiring his guns and obeyed ever other law in the process except for the felony of lying on ATF Form 4473.

But I will not oppose background checks as long as various means of legal anonymous firearms ownership exist. Private sales, antique arms and building your own guns are all free of government oversight in most states. Including my own. Most people don't get spun up about it. The only ones that do, strangely, are the only ones who know nothing about the laws that exist and think some nefarious activity is taking place.

Somehow, I am not bothered if someone gets their knickers in a knot because I was able to buy a 125 year old piece of history without a government bureaucrat saying it was ok. And just to make sure that knot is good and tight, understand the 125+ year old rifle bought without a background check fires the exact same cartridge that my Yugo M48 Mauser does and was bought with a background check. Assuming the antique is in good condition, it is just as lethal in the wrong hands.

Somehow, I just don't see a drug dealer doing a drive-by with a nearly four foot long, single shot antique no matter how powerful the round. But I'm sure people will be stunned and horrified that this is even possible. And I'm not even a licensed collector!

Most won't even care that in 99.9% or greater of these cases, all these untracked guns will do is hang on a wall or sit in a safe amongst their peers. They're guns and that's all that matters. Logic is the first thing that leaves their brains when that topic is involved.

When all is said and done, I am approaching the glorious "double arsenal" mark. Those of you in the know can figure out how many guns are involved but suffice it to say, a third cabinet is order. They are starting to overflow and getting the guns in and out is like assembling a large wooden puzzle.

I think I can get used to that.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

We Demand!

I have a treat coming to me on Thursday.

My family is coming in for my wedding this weekend. In the conversations leading up to that event, my mother informed me that I had received a letter from the Canadian government demanding to know why I had not voted in Canadian elections for the past several years. According to my mother, this was a legal form that I am apparently required to send back to them to provide an official response for my transgression.

Following the laughter and wondering if it had an option for "Get fucked! None of your business!", I had to shake my head. I'm not sure if there is a specific legal requirement for a Canadian citizen to vote in an election but I wouldn't be surprised if there was one at this point.

Socialism comes in many forms and not all of them are benign. Most supporters of socialism only see the benefits to them. Welfare, social programs, "free" health care and so on. But stuff like this can represent a downside. How can you have a free, vibrant representative democracy (or parliamentary in the case of Canada) when there are laws on the books that force citizens to vote upon legal penalty?

Doesn't that take away your free will and ability to dissent? To say: "I support none of you and will vote with my conscience by staying home on Election Day.". What if the society decides for the good of us that everyone must vote? Will they send police to force you to vote at gunpoint or imprison you in contempt of society until you do?

While I deplore the abysmal turnouts that general occur in American elections, at least you're free here to give the electioneers the middle finger and stay home. Can you imagine the riots that would ensue if there was a legal requirement to vote here? Although many leftist politicians would support such a thing, it would totally undermine individual freedom and liberty to choose or not choose.

So I am really looking forward to getting this letter from my mother. Because I want to see what law, if any, that is compelling me to reply. Because if there isn't one, I am going to thoroughly enjoy supplying them with a suitable response. Of course, my first inclination is to simply crumple it up and bin it. How dare the Canadian government demand an explanation of me as to my lack of voting!

Last time I checked, it was not legal for me to do so as I am an expatriate Canadian living in a foreign country. If they can't check Canadian tax records filed back in 1998 by me that indicated I was no longer liable to pay taxes in Canada because I was a resident of the USA (and paying taxes to the IRS in accordance with Canadian and US tax reciprocity agreements), tough on them.

The opportunities for mischief abound on this one. If I am legally required to provide them a response on penalty of some fine or imprisonment, I will certainly do so. The temptation to head down to the Canadian Embassy in Washington DC afterwards and ask for the form to formally renounce my Canadian citizenship afterwards will be really hard to resist though.

I will let you know if that is the case because I am sure you will want to know just how illusionary your freedom in Canada really is in some cases. I'm not knocking Canada yet but if they've passed a law giving them the power to demand such justifications from supposedly free citizens then my homeland is well on its way to becoming another formerly Great Britain. Or France, depending on what the French in Canada are doing these days.

Hopefully it is some bureaucratic form that some self-important bimbo thinks they can send out because of regulations they wrote internally and not backed by the force of law. If not, it is still tempting to ignore it just to see if they'd be willing to issue an extradition order for an ex-pat in the USA on the grounds they weren't voting. I dare say I might find a few folks sympathetic to my plight here to keep me from being sent back. That whole freedom thing and all that.

I weep for my homeland.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Masochism

This will not make sense to my non-computer geek readers out there. But I am sure a few of you will get it.

Definition of masochism: Attempting to install OS/2 on a Thinkpad 560Z.

Just had to get that out there.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Pelosi's Compromise

Never trust the words of any politician. It seems Nancy Pelosi has done a bit of an about-face on the issue of "assault weapons".

From The Hill Blog:
During an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America," Pelosi said that the Congress will work to find some middle ground between the previous ban, which expired in 2004, and the precedent laid by the Supreme Court in a ruling enumerating more concrete gunowners' rights last term.

"We have to find some level of compromise," Pelosi said, citing 53 victims of gun violence nationwide in less than a month. "And we have to rid the debate of the misconceptions people have about what gun safety means."

"Yes, it is," the Speaker said when asked if the ball is in Congress's court now that Democrats control the White House. "And we are just going to have to work together to come to some resolution."

Pelosi indicated that new regulations might entail registration and prohibitions on transporting some firearms across state lines.
So we've gone from gun control is off the table in response to AG Eric Holder's comments about reinstanting the so-called "assault weapon ban" to Pelosi stating a compromise needs to be made on this issue.

Funny, I thought compromise involved two or more parties coming to mutual agreement on an issue? I don't recall gun owners talking to her or the Democratic leadership and agreeing to further curtail their rights. What did we get out of the deal? National CCW? Repeal of the Hughes Amendment? Removing of the "sporting purpose" clause from GCA'68?

Nope, no compromise to be found here.

In the politicians world, compromise means "I won't take away as many of your rights as I would like to at this time.".

And she thinks her statement is a compromise?!? Federal gun registration and what sounds like imposing NFA interstate transport requirements on common Title 1 firearms. That's a compromise?!? How is it every time some politician suggests a "compromise" on an issue, those on the receiving end of the compromise find their rights curtailed more afterwards?

This is how freedom dies, folks.

At least Pelosi is back to showing her true colors. We all knew her prior protestations on gun control not being an issue previously was simply her waiting for the right opportunity. I guess she feels this past week or two has given it to her. Fine by me. I, at least, prefer dealing with an enemy whose intentions are clearly stated upfront.

The battle lines are starting to be drawn. I fear we are about to cross the Rubicon into a very unpleasant place.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Playing with the Grandkids

I am sorry to say that I did not obtain a M96 sniper rifle as I claimed yesterday. I was pulling your leg. Still, it is a nice dream and a rifle I definitely lust after. My wife-to-be, as wonderful as she is, is rather emphatic on the "No!" part when I showed her that gun. When the house is paid for, the retirement funds are there, plenty of savings, maybe then I can afford to go crazy on such a beautiful addition to the collection.

Sorry for any pangs of jealousy I may have induced. Admittedly, it is tough to beat last year's entry.

On truthful news, I am doing gun related stuff this weekend. I am taking an NRA Metallic Reloading course on Saturday. It's one of the things I resolved to do this year. It should be a good day.

Still working on the writing thing and getting the ducks in a row on that. On that, I decided to take a page out of Marko's book with how I want to approach the problem of getting words out. Distraction is my big problem. I had bought my netbook with the intention of using it as a dedicated writing platform. Problem with that was it was a little too small. I loved the weight, just couldn't type well on it.

The laptop that replaced it suffers from the same problem as my desktops: it's a full-fledged computer with the Internet. Doesn't take much to switch away from OpenOffice and wind up on Wikipedia.

Marko recommends the Alphasmart Neo as the best writing tool out there. As I've worked through this, I'm starting to agree with him. However, the price tag of the Neo can be a bit of a put-off, especially if it is something you might not keep at.

Marko refers to the "cult of the Neo" among writers. He has mentioned in passing that the Neo is merely the latest in a line of similar machines. What many people don't realize is that line goes back to the early 1980s. So I got thinking and figured if it was good enough then, it should be good enough for now.

The Alphasmart Neo is the lineal descendant of the Tandy Model 100. The features that the Neo crows about such as battery endurance, portability, dedicated purpose were all features of the Model 100. The Model 100 was the first notebook computer. Everything the Neo is can be traced back to the Model 100.

Well, as a little digging will show, the Model 100 family of machines still enjoy wide popularity despite being nearly 30 years old. They also enjoy one advantage over a Neo: cost. A used Model 102 costs a mere fraction of a Neo and will give you a lot of its functionality. eBay is your best friend.

So I've been on a eBay spree as of late. I've manged to pick up four of these little gems of different models so far. A Model 100, a Model 102, an NEC PC-8201A and a Tandy WP-2. The Model 100 is strictly a collector's item. The Model 102 is nice but I've found for tinkering I prefer the PC-8201A. It is the last one, the WP-2, I want to talk about.

The WP-2 is an uprated and stripped down Model 102 in many respects. The WP stands for "word processing" which is exactly what the machine is designed to do. Like the Neo, the WP-2 is geared for the sole purpose of writing text. It runs, like its siblings, on 4 AA batteries. Unlike its brother, the Model 102, the WP-2 can only do word processing. It lacks a programming language and other utilities. But retains all of the formers's communication abilities. It also features an even slimmer form factor than the 102 in an attractive black case and has an 80 column display instead of the 40 column found on its predecessor.

It can also be expanded to twice the memory of the Model 102 and the chip costs a pittance. While it can't approach the Neo for capacity, I'd argue the 40-50 pages of text that can be squeezed into a fully expanded WP-2 is sufficient for most purposes. And you can't argue with the price tag.

I got my WP-2 shipped for $20. The unit is in near-mint condition. I've seen several units as well as the later WP-3 units sell for similar prices.

I'm not knocking the Neo; it's a great piece of hardware. But a 25 year old design can do the same job for a lot less money. Of course, the downside with these older machines is having to figure out how to get data from them to your PC. You need to use the serial port, a null modem cable and some terminal software. For a lot of people today that is just too much. If you grew up with computers the way I did, not so bad. Or you can just use a NADSBox and merge the old and the new.

Admittedly, if you get a NADSBox, you've just eliminated the cost incentive as it costs nearly as much as a Neo itself but gives the WP-2 (or any Model 100/102) essentially unlimited capacity. But if you're willing to spend $15 on a null modem cable and can use a terminal program, a Model 100/102, WP-2 or WP-3 is a writer's bargain.

Personally, I prefer playing with the older hardware. I much prefer the form factor of the Model 102 and WP-2 over the Neo. And I can hack the Model 100 hardware. That's the other reason I got them. But for writing, I bought the WP-2. It just needs a new battery backup, commonly available at CVS or Radio Shack and easily installed, and its ready to use. Writing on the go. I may bring it with me on my honeymoon.

Marko prefers the trendy modern, I'm going to try the old and stodgy. Perhaps someday the Neo can tells its descendants, "Back in my day..." but I suspect a Model 102 will be lurking in the background still creaking along and shaking its head.

Out with the new, in with the old!

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Speechless

I love my wife-to-be. She gave me my wedding present last night.

I cannot believe she actually bookmarked the rifle and then ordered it for me. She gets wide-eyed at the cost of an AR-15. I am speechless beyond words.

She will be getting lots of roses for the next few months as well as some very nice jewelry.

I love you, sweetheart!